Thursday, November 21, 2013

Blog Post VI - Essay 1: Transition from Scribal to Print Literacy

Ugh... I always forget to change the working title for something better!


Margarita Kravchenko
Prof. Barbara Gleason
Theories and Models of Literacy
11/18/13
From Scribal To Print: The Transition
It is not known when exactly the transition from scribal to print literacy has begun. What is known, however, is that this transition was a product of, first and foremost, major economic changes in Europe. In order to understand how this transition came to be, one has to look closely at what was happening in Europe during the Middle Ages and beyond.
Literacy was not always the activity available to just about anyone, as it is today. Early on, it was a privilege enjoyed primarily by the clergy and the wealthy class of the society, mostly because it was a rather costly affair. Before paper became the primary “carrier” of the printed word, mediums like clay, papyrus, parchment, and vellum were used extensively. However, those materials were expensive and not very utilitarian. Clay tablets, for example, were too cumbersome to transport, and papyrus, however relatively portable, was too brittle. Moreover, the Egyptians, who possessed the technology of producing papyrus, at the time one of the primary materials, would not readily part with it. As per Alberto Manguel, the prohibition of papyrus export by an Egyptian King Ptolemy led to “the invention of parchment in Pergamum in the second century BC” (126). Parchment and vellum, both made from animal skins, were significantly more durable and strong; Manguel states that “[b]y the fourth century, and until the appearance of paper in Italy eight centuries later, parchment was the preferred material throughout Europe for the making of books” (126). Also because of parchment’s durability and its ease of transport, the format of the books changed from scrolls to codex, a volume of bound pages. It had numerous advantages over scrolls – for one, text could be written on both sides of a page thus making codex hold more volume of writing in a smaller amount of pages. Another of codex’s advantages was the existence of margins, therefore giving a reader an opportunity to comment on the read text and thus “allowing the reader a hand in the story – a participation that was far more difficult when reading from a scroll” (Manguel 127).
However, both parchment and vellum remained not very cost-effective thus making owing books a privilege of the wealthy. Along with that, the process of reproduction was lengthy, not to mention costly. The books that were reproduced were mostly religious texts, including the Bible and so called Book of Hours, a personal prayer book. According to Manguel, this was because “much of the life of Europeans in the Middle Ages was spent in religious offices” (128). That and religion being a significant part of people’s lives was the other reason for reading and writing not being as widely spread as it is today. With the church vying for control over the minds of the individuals, it was only natural for the clergy to try and limit the access to the “printed” word. Even owing a Bible had its caveats, mostly associated with the spreading of silent reading. Going from reading out loud surrounded by other people to reading privately to one’s self presented a major threat for the church since silent reading invited independent interpretation of the text. Manguel posits that “[a] book that can be read privately… is no longer subject to immediate clarification or guidance, condemnation or censorship by a listener” (51). In other words, silent reading undermined the “establishing [of] a common dogma” (Manguel 51), and the advent of printing exacerbated it even more.
Emergence of a new merchant class, as well as arrival of the Renaissance movement was responsible for the growth of interest in reading and writing. Alister McGrath posits that with the emergence of the merchant class, “[t]raditional social structures were undermined by greater social mobility, increased wealth and spending power within the middle classes, and a surge of literacy and levels of educational achievement within the population as a whole” (6). Social hierarchy was crumbling; conventional attitudes and values were becoming outdated. The new social class was beginning to take shape and set the new priorities, literacy being one of them. The movement responsible for promoting and developing reading and writing was the Renaissance. It served as an impetus for the entrepreneurs in several ways, mostly by altering the mindset of the individuals associated with the movement. Reading and writing was not a mere tool for keeping records anymore; McGrath asserts that “[b]eing able to read was now seen as the key to personal fulfillment; to own books was a statement of social status. … The Renaissance set to promote written and spoken eloquence, and placed considerable emphasis on cultivating both reading and writing” (7). Since more people were not only interested in owning books but were able to afford it as well, the demand for the reading materials rose. However, the demand could not be matched with the existing supply because the process of reproduction was still painstakingly slow and expensive. There were simply not enough scribes to satisfy the growing demand for the reading materials, and a new way of reproducing books had to be conjured. Johannes Gutenberg of Mainz, Germany was the man to do that.
Gutenberg was not the only one in search of a faster and cheaper way to reproduce books but he was the one who has accomplished it first. Perhaps his success could be attributed to the fact that he was trained in metalworking and worked as a goldsmith. After several years of experimenting with various ways of transferring ink to paper, Gutenberg finally put them all together to create the printing press. McGrath maintains that  “Gutenberg’s genius lay in creating a system that incorporated both new and old ideas, allowing a task to be performed with unprecedented efficiency” (10). Gutenberg’s main invention was a movable metal type that could be reused after the initial printing was done. The metal used to produce the type was an alloy of lead, tin and antimony, a combination devised to prevent the metal from wearing off. Another major innovation was a new type of ink “made from lampblack – the soot deposited by candle flames on cold surface – and varnish” (McGrath 11). Unlike the brown ink used earlier, which faded with time, Gutenberg’s black ink was permanent. This, in turn, led to paper becoming the primary medium for the printed word as it absorbed this new and permanent ink significantly better than vellum did. As for the press itself, Gutenberg found that the machines used in wine-making and bookbinding were equally suitable for transferring ink to paper. By combining these innovations with existing methods, Gutenberg set the printing process in motion. His experiments started around 1440, and the first printed Bible was produced between 1452 and 1456.
            To this day the Bible remains the best-selling book in the world. It was even more so in Gutenberg’s time. With the development of printing industry and with the Renaissance movement spreading throughout Europe, the Bible was the perfect first book to produce with the new technology –for several reasons. McGrath asserts that “many households saw the possession of a Bible as essential for the private matter of personal devotion, not to mention the rather more sordid and public matter of drawing attention to their social status” (14-15). In other words, owing a Bible was both private and public; it not only allowed its owners to practice religion in the quiet of their home but also sent out a powerful message about their social standing. Apart from the Bible, Gutenberg was also printing indulgences – “pieces of paper, issued on behalf of the Pope or a local bishop, offering written promises of dispensation from time in purgatory” (McGrath 15) – that became a very profitable addition to the existing enterprise. However, in spite of that, Gutenberg died in poverty in 1468.
            During mid- to late 15th century, printing houses were spreading throughout Europe. More people were learning to read and write, and with more and more printing houses emerging, more people could afford to buy books. With the advance of the printed word came the relative decline of the oral word; Kernan comments by saying that “this [printed] kind of authority grew into the authenticity that is probably the absolute mark of print culture, a generally accepted view that what is printed is true, or at least truer than any other type of record” (49). People began to rely on written documents and trust them more than they did the spoken word. However, this was not the case with the ruling class of the 16th and 17th century England and consequently, of those under the patronage of the crown, namely, poets. The patronage system, established at the king’s court, provided poets with means for a living, along with various gifts, in exchange for their talent. Therefore, the advancement of printing system posed a threat for the court by having a potential to eliminate (which it did) the patronage system altogether since the “gentlemen of the court” could have an opportunity of earning a living by selling their work.
On the other hand, poets also took issue with the printed work. Some preferred to circulate their poetry on hand-written manuscripts; others, although having given in to publishing their work, insisted on keeping their names out of the manuscript. Kernan explains this by pointing out to “a fashionable and long continuing, though not universally observed, antipathy to a medium that perverted the primary courtly literary values: privacy and rarity” (42). In other words, at the time poetry was still equated with the court and therefore had to possess the aforementioned qualities: it had to be private, meant only for the patron, and rare – special, one of a kind, written with a specific person in mind.  Printed word, on the other hand, was quite the opposite: it was public – as in available to the wide public; it was multiple – as in multiple copies of the same poem could be printed; and most of all it was commercial.



Works Cited:
Kernan, Alvin. Samuel Johnson and the Impact of Print. New Jersey: Princeton UP, 1987/1989.
Manguel, Alberto. A History of Reading. New York: Viking, 1996.

McGrath, Alister. In The Beginning: the Story of the King James Bible and How It Changed a Nation, a Language and a Culture.: New York: Anchor Books, 2001.

Blog Post V - Research Paper Proposal

That was tough writing. Hopefully the paper itself will be smoother.

Margarita Kravchenko
Theories and Models of Literacy
Prof. Barbara Gleason
11/7/13
Research Essay Proposal
            I have chosen to research the works of John Dewey, the man who was responsible for transforming America’s educational system. Originally my intention was to focus on the ideas of the great philosophers like Plato and Jean Jacques Rousseau; I planned to compare and contrast them and trace their influence – or the lack of it – on the modern educational system. The reason I chose to write about this is, first, I love history, and I am always interested in finding out how things came to be what they are now. Also, I find it fascinating that the ideas of the distant past can still be traced in the works of modern thinkers. However, after doing some initial research, I decided to shift gears and focus solely on the works of John Dewey. It seems that his ideas are more closely connected with the various concepts of literacy. Dewey’s work could be summarized by a phrase “learning by doing”; he aimed at integrating schools with society and creating a curriculum that would include solving real-life problems. This content-based approach is similar to the view of literacy as social practices; according to this theory, the meanings embedded in spoken or written words are viewed as social constructs. This fits rather well with Dewey’s ideas of making education functional and applicable to the every day’s challenges. One of his essays is titled My Pedagogic Creed, and one of the very first principles of that creed is belief in that “all education proceeds by the participation of the individual in the social consciousness of the race” (19). In other words, the goal of education is to provide the individuals with the tools they need to be a part of the “social consciousness” of the society. This, in turn, ties in closely with the concept of functional literacy which defines literacy “in terms of its social purposes, the demands made on individuals within a given society, to function within that society, to participate and to achieve their own goals” (Papen quoting Baynham, 9).
            To sum it up, it seems that Dewey’s ideas can be traced in two rather different approaches to literacy: functional literacy and literacy as social practices. While functional literacy exists as a set of skills necessary for an individual to successfully function within a society, with an emphasis on employment and economic development, literacy as social practices emphasizes personal development and encompasses context within which the individuals are performing their daily activities. Could such dissimilar ideas have stemmed from the writings of one man? Which view of literacy could lay a stronger claim on the connection to Dewey’s works? And finally, how did Dewey’s idea of integrating schools with society fare in relation to adult literacy learners? These questions will be the main ones I will focus on answering. In my research I will rely both on primary and secondary sources, such as works by Dewey himself as well as works by authors like Uta Papen and E.D. Hirsh, Jr on various theories of literacy.

Annotated Bibliography:
Dewey, John. Dewey on Education: Selections with an Introduction and Notes by Martin. S. Dworkin. New York: Teachers College Press, 1959. This publication consists of Dewey’s several writings on education, including My Pedagogic Creed, The School and Society, The Child and the Curriculum and Progressive Education and the Science of Education. Dworkin’s compilation provides the look at Dewey’s ideas about progressive education and the interaction between schools and society.
Dewey, John. Experience and Education. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1997. In this volume Dewey focuses on the connection between experience and education. He postulates that education – or, rather, learning – should not be a mere “acquisition of what already is incorporated in books and in the heads of the elders” (19). Instead, the educators are tasked with creating the classroom experiences that will provide the student with a desire to learn more. In other words, Dewey posits that education, and the process of learning, should be relevant to students’ lives and interests.
Hirsch Jr., E.D. Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know. Boston: Houghton Muffin; 1987. In this controversial work, Hirsch coins the concept of cultural literacy, shared background knowledge that he thinks is crucial for a successful and well-balanced development of individuals. He brings in Dewey as an example of short-sightedness claiming that Dewey “mistook a half-truth for the whole. He placed too much faith in children’s ability to learn general skills from a few typical experiences and too hastily rejected ‘the piling up of information’” (xv). Hirsch posits that there exists a need for a new educational theory that would rely heavily on the presence of “specific, communally shared information” in the curriculum.
Papen, Uta. Adult Literacy as Social Practice: More than Skills. London and New York: Routledge, 2005. A social anthropologist, Papen studies literacy as cultural and social practice. In this book, she investigates the sociocultural view of literacy, namely, how this theory compares to other theories of literacy and how literacy is being taught in adult basic education. Papen also argues that “teachers and curriculum developers have much to gain from understanding the role of literacy in learners’ lives, in relation to such central aspects as their families, their social networks and their jobs” (2). In other words, Papen posits that social life of adults can have a major impact on how they learn.
Sontag, Frederick. “Science and Evolution in Education: Dewey’s Dream and Reality”. Journal of General Education 17:2 (1965): 91-100. Sontag, a philosophy professor, examines Dewey’s views on science in the context of evaluating his theory of education. Sontag questions Dewey’s “confidence that all natural sciences can and should serve as models for the social sciences, and that both in turn can provide the context for the humanistic study” (92). Sontag posits that science (and natural sciences) is not always the solution to the problems of education – and life in general.


Friday, November 8, 2013

Blog Post IV - Other People's Words

What a fascinating case study this was. I cannot quite get over this family's story and the fact that both Jenny and Donny were prevented from becoming literate and possibly moving up in the society. Purcell-Gates posits that the divide between the classes in modern society contributes to the low levels of literacy among the less privileged. This divide also creates the feeling of alienation which separates the classes even further. As a result, it is extremely difficult for children “born into cultures that are low literate and/or restricted in their scope of literacy” (183) to achieve the level of literacy that is deemed appropriate for their age. As a consequence, they are either kept back (Donny) or end up dropping out of school (Jenny), and it becomes ever more difficult to break the cycle of low literacy as it transfers from a parent to a child.